William Branham

← Back to People

William Marrion Branham was an American evangelist whose healing campaigns, beginning in 1946, set the pattern for the post-war healing revival and made him one of its most prominent figures in its early years. He started as an independent Baptist pastor in Jeffersonville, Indiana, and ended his life teaching a distinctive body of doctrine that rejected the Trinity as the creeds confess it, held that Cain was fathered by the serpent, and identified Branham himself as the prophet promised to the last church age. He died on December 24, 1965, and his recorded sermons continue to be the governing authority for the congregations that call themselves the Message.

Branham matters to a Catholic reader for one reason above all others. A great deal of independent charismatic teaching that circulates today, on the Godhead, on the last age, on denominations, and on the authority of an anointed man's word, traces back through him. This page covers what he taught, what he claimed, what happened, and what the record actually shows, with the doctrine of the movement stated as the movement states it before any Catholic answer is given.

Early life and the Baptist years

Branham was born on April 6, 1909, in rural Kentucky, into a poor family that moved to the area around Jeffersonville, Indiana, while he was still a child. His own accounts of his childhood describe severe poverty, a father who drank, and an early sense of being marked out by supernatural experiences. Those accounts come almost entirely from Branham's own preaching, and they are the only source for most of the details in them.

He was converted and ordained in independent Baptist circles in the early 1930s and began pastoring a small congregation in Jeffersonville that became known as Branham Tabernacle. He described a baptismal service he conducted in the Ohio River in 1933 at which a light appeared over him and a voice spoke, telling him that his message would be a forerunner of the second coming. That account is Branham's testimony. No documentation of the event exists independent of the recollections of people who were there, and those recollections differ. This page reports it as his claim rather than as a verified occurrence.

His first wife, Hope, and their infant daughter died in 1937, in the aftermath of the great Ohio River flood. Branham later preached that he understood their deaths as chastisement for having declined an earlier call to itinerant ministry. The interpretation is his own and he stated it publicly many times. It is included here because it shaped his later conviction that refusing the call carried a price, which in turn shaped how urgently he pressed his hearers.

The commissioning he described in 1946

Branham's public ministry turned on a single event he said took place on May 7, 1946, at a place in southern Indiana he called Green's Mill. He described being met by an angel who told him he had been sent with a gift of healing, and who gave him two signs by which people would believe: first, that he would be able to detect disease through a physical sensation in his left hand when he took a person's hand, and second, that he would eventually know the secrets of people's hearts.

Everything about that account rests on Branham's own testimony, repeated over two decades of preaching, with variations in detail across the tellings that are visible in the published transcripts his own movement distributes and that his defenders attribute to the informality of extemporaneous preaching. There is no independent witness to the encounter, and there could not be, since he described it as private. What can be documented is what happened next: within weeks he was holding healing services, and within two years he was drawing crowds in the thousands.

The healing campaigns

From 1946 Branham held healing campaigns across the United States and, later, in Canada, Europe, South Africa and India. The services followed a form that would become standard across the revival: extended singing, a sermon, then a prayer line in which Branham took people by the hand, named the illness he said he was perceiving, and prayed. In his later campaigns the second sign became the centrepiece, with Branham telling people details about their lives, names, home towns, and circumstances, that he said had been given to him.

He did not run the campaigns alone. Gordon Lindsay, a minister who became his campaign manager, founded a magazine called The Voice of Healing in 1948 largely to publicise Branham's meetings, and it went on to serve as the house organ of the whole healing revival. F. F. Bosworth, an older evangelist with a long healing ministry of his own, joined the team and lent it credibility with an earlier generation. Branham withdrew from campaigning in 1948 because of exhaustion and illness and resumed after a break.

The Houston photograph

In January 1950, during a Houston meeting connected to a public dispute with a local Baptist minister, a photographer took a picture in which a bright shape appears above Branham's head. Branham's associates commissioned an examination of the negative by a document examiner named George J. Lacy, and Lacy's reported conclusion was that the negative had not been retouched and that light had struck the film. His ministry has cited that examination ever since as scientific confirmation.

What Lacy is reported to have found is narrower than the use made of it. An examiner who concludes that a negative was not tampered with has said nothing about what produced the light, and photographic artefacts from flash equipment of that era are a routine explanation that the examination did not exclude. This page reports the photograph, the examination and the claim, and states that no finding of a supernatural cause has ever been made by anyone qualified to make one.

Healings claimed and healings verified

Branham's campaigns produced a large volume of healing testimony, printed in The Voice of Healing and recounted in the meetings themselves. Some of those accounts involve conditions with a well documented pattern of spontaneous or psychosomatic improvement. Others were never followed up at all. No systematic independent medical audit of Branham's campaigns was carried out during his lifetime or since, which means two things at once: nobody has demonstrated that a healing occurred that medicine cannot account for, and nobody has demonstrated fraud either.

The honest position is that the healing claims are undetermined. Catholics have no difficulty believing that God heals, and the Church takes the possibility seriously enough to run one of the most demanding verification processes in the world at Lourdes, where a medical bureau examines cases for years and confirms only a handful. Our guide to how the Church investigates miracles sets out what that process requires. The contrast with a stage announcement is the point: careful verification is how a claim earns belief.

Influence on Oral Roberts and the wider revival

Historians of American Pentecostalism generally treat Branham as the man who opened the healing revival that ran from the late 1940s through the 1950s. David Edwin Harrell Jr., whose study All Things Are Possible remains the standard history of the movement, describes Branham as the pacesetter whose success demonstrated that a full-time independent healing ministry could draw crowds and fund itself, and whose example the others followed.

Oral Roberts launched his own healing ministry in 1947, the year after Branham's, and built it into a far larger and far better organised operation with a magazine, a television programme and eventually a university. Roberts developed his own theology and his own methods, and his ministry outlasted Branham's by decades. The point of the comparison is chronological and structural: the format Branham established, the independent evangelist, the arena crusade, the prayer line, the subscriber magazine, became the template, and dozens of ministries were built on it.

That template still runs. The healing crusade as practised by later figures such as Benny Hinn descends from this period, and so does the wider Word of Faith world represented by Kenneth Copeland. Branham himself was not a prosperity preacher and his personal circumstances are generally reported as modest, which is worth stating plainly given how the movement he helped launch later developed. Our guide to what the prosperity gospel teaches covers that later development.

The doctrinal turn after 1960

Through the 1950s Branham's teaching stayed close to the general Pentecostal mainstream, and his campaigns drew support across denominational lines. From about 1960 that changed. He began preaching a connected body of doctrine, in sermon series recorded and transcribed, that placed him at the centre of God's plan for the age and set him against the whole of organised Christianity. The material below is stated as he taught it, using his own categories, before any response.

The Godhead

Branham taught that God is one Person, and that Father, Son and Holy Spirit are three offices, dispensations or manifestations of that one Person rather than three distinct Persons. He argued that the word trinity does not appear in Scripture, that the doctrine was formulated at the Council of Nicaea in 325 under imperial pressure, and that it therefore came from Rome and not from the apostles. He held that three-fold baptism in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit was invalid and that baptism must be in the name of Jesus Christ, and he re-baptised people accordingly.

This position places him within the Oneness stream of Pentecostalism, which had separated from trinitarian Pentecostals in the 1910s over exactly these questions. Our guide to Pentecostalism and its major branches sets out the Oneness position in its own terms and the trinitarian position that most Pentecostals hold. Branham was never a member of the Oneness denominations, and the later Message doctrine went well past anything those bodies teach.

Serpent Seed

Branham taught that the sin in Eden was sexual. On his reading, the serpent was an upright, near-human creature, Eve's transgression was a sexual act with him, and Cain was the child of that union. Cain's descendants therefore constitute a literal seed of the serpent that runs through history in parallel with the line of Adam, and Branham applied that framework to explain the presence of evil, unbelief and false religion in the world.

He drew practical conclusions from it. His teaching on women, on divorce and remarriage, and on the character of the last generation all rest on the Serpent Seed structure, and Message congregations that retain the doctrine generally retain those conclusions with it.

The seventh church age and the Elijah claim

In a 1960 sermon series on the seven churches of Revelation 2 and 3, Branham read the seven churches as seven successive periods of church history, each with a divinely appointed messenger, and identified the seventh, Laodicea, as the present age. He identified himself as the messenger to Laodicea. He also applied to himself the prophecy of Malachi 4:5-6 that God would send Elijah the prophet before the day of the Lord, treating it as a promise of a final prophetic voice to the last age. In 1963 he preached a series on the seven seals of Revelation which he presented as the opening of mysteries that had been sealed until his own ministry.

Around the 1963 seal sermons he connected an unusual high-altitude cloud photographed over northern Arizona, which received press attention at the time, to a vision he said he had received. Meteorological explanations for high-altitude clouds of that kind exist and were offered. The association between the cloud and the sermons is Branham's own, made after the fact.

Denominations as the mark of the beast

Branham taught that denominational organisation as such is the work of the enemy, that the Catholic Church is the woman of Revelation 17, and that the Protestant denominations are her daughters. He taught that accepting denominational authority over one's conscience is the mark of the beast, and he called believers to come out of every organised body. Our guide to what the mark of the beast means in Revelation and our guide to Babylon the Great handle those texts in full.

The Catholic answer to those teachings

The Catholic response to Branham's later doctrine rests on what Scripture says and what the Church has confessed from the beginning. Each point below can be checked by a reader with a Bible and a Catechism in front of them.

On the Trinity

The Church confesses one God in three co-equal, co-eternal Persons: Father, Son and Holy Spirit, one in being, distinct in relation. The Catechism calls this the central mystery of Christian faith and life (Catechism of the Catholic Church 234). The argument that the doctrine was invented at Nicaea in 325 mistakes definition for invention. Nicaea and Constantinople put into precise language what the Church already prayed and believed, under pressure from Arius, who taught that the Son was a creature.

The apostolic material is earlier than any council. Jesus commands baptism in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, one name and three Persons (Matthew 28:19). Paul closes a letter with the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit (2 Corinthians 13:14). John's Gospel has the Son sending the Spirit from the Father and the Son distinct from the Father while being God (John 1:1, John 15:26). Our guide to the doctrine of the Trinity works through the scriptural basis in detail, and our guide to baptism and its valid form covers the formula.

On Serpent Seed

Genesis says what happened. Chapter 3 records a conversation, a command broken and fruit eaten. Chapter 4 opens with Adam knowing Eve his wife, and she conceives and bears Cain (Genesis 4:1). The text names Cain's father. When the New Testament refers to Cain being of the evil one (1 John 3:12), the passage is discussing moral likeness, and it says so in the same sentence, because his own deeds were evil and his brother's righteous.

Catholic teaching holds that original sin is transmitted to all Adam's descendants by propagation, which means every human being descends from Adam and every human being inherits the same wounded condition (Catechism of the Catholic Church 404). A doctrine of two bloodlines divides humanity into two origins and undercuts the reason Christ's assumption of one human nature can save all of it. Our guide to original sin and how it is transmitted sets out the teaching.

On the claim to be the prophet of the last age

Public revelation was completed in Christ, and no new public revelation is to be expected before his return in glory (Catechism of the Catholic Church 66). Private revelations, which the Church does sometimes recognise, do not improve on or complete Christ's revelation; they can only help people live it more fully in a particular period (Catechism of the Catholic Church 67). A claim to be the appointed voice whose teaching supersedes what the Church has held fails at that first step, whatever the personal qualities of the man making it.

Scripture also gives readers a test they can apply themselves. Paul writes that if anyone, even an angel from heaven, preaches a gospel other than the one received, let him be accursed (Galatians 1:8). John tells believers to test the spirits (1 John 4:1) and Paul tells them to test everything and hold fast what is good (1 Thessalonians 5:21). Deuteronomy gives the plainest standard for prophecy: if a word does not come to pass, the Lord did not speak it (Deuteronomy 18:22).

On the seven church ages

Reading the seven churches of Revelation 2 and 3 as seven consecutive eras of history, with the reader's own moment as the last one, is a scheme with no support in the text. The seven were real congregations in the Roman province of Asia, receiving letters about their real situations, and the Church has read them as addressed to every age of the Church at once. Our guide to the seven churches of Revelation works through each letter, and our guide to the seven seals handles the material Branham preached in 1963. The historicist scheme is also, in practice, self-serving: it always makes the interpreter's own generation the final one and the interpreter its messenger.

The predictions and how they turned out

Branham said that in 1933 he received a vision of seven coming events, and he returned to that list repeatedly in later preaching. The published versions include the rise of dictators and a second world war, a prediction that a woman would come to great power in the United States, a vision of an egg-shaped car driven under its own control, and the destruction of the United States. He tied the sequence to a horizon of 1977, saying that by then the world systems would end and the millennium would begin.

He hedged that last item deliberately. In the sermons where he gives the 1977 horizon, he says he is predicting rather than prophesying, and that he is not saying thus saith the Lord. Fair reporting has to include the hedge, and fair reporting also has to record the outcome. 1977 passed with none of it. Branham had died twelve years earlier and so never had to account for it. Message teachers who address the statement generally rely on the distinction he drew, treating 1977 as a prediction he was entitled to get wrong rather than as a prophecy that failed. Congregations differ, and this page does not speak for any of them.

A reader can decide for themselves whether that distinction holds up. What Deuteronomy 18:22 tests is the word claimed to be from God, and a preacher who separates his predictions from his prophecies has at least been honest about which is which. What the episode does establish is that his sense of the timetable was wrong, and that a movement built on the premise that its founder had the final word for the last age has an unfulfilled date in its own founding documents. Our guide to how to identify a false prophet works through the biblical tests, and our guide to the end times covers what the Church actually teaches about the timetable.

The 1965 collision and his death

On December 18, 1965, Branham was travelling by car in Texas with his family when the vehicle was struck head-on. He was severely injured and died of those injuries on December 24, 1965, at the age of 56. Others were hurt in the collision, and this page does not set out who or how badly, because it has no source it can stand behind for that detail.

His burial did not follow immediately. Contemporary accounts record that a number of followers expected him to rise from the dead, some connecting the expectation to Easter, and the funeral and burial were delayed for months. He was buried at Jeffersonville, Indiana, in the spring of 1966. Some in the movement later held that he would return before the end. The movement has no body that can speak for it, and congregations differ on the question.

The Message movement after Branham

The Message is a network rather than a denomination. Its congregations are independent, they have no shared governing body and no agreed confession, and what unites them is the treatment of Branham's recorded sermons as the authoritative teaching for this age. Voice of God Recordings, based in Jeffersonville, has distributed the sermon tapes and transcripts for decades and has translated them into many languages, which is the principal reason a movement with no central structure spread as widely as it did.

Congregations exist across Africa, India, Latin America, Europe and North America. Published estimates of adherents vary by an order of magnitude depending on who is counting and what counts as membership, and this page does not adopt a figure. Positions vary between congregations as well. Some hold that the sermons are the spoken Word of God for the age and stand above the Bible in practice, some treat them as authoritative commentary on the Bible, and some have quietly dropped Serpent Seed while keeping the Oneness position on the Godhead.

Where a Message group holds that only its own members constitute the true bride, requires members to break contact with family outside the group, or makes one man's interpretation unreviewable, it has crossed into the territory our framework page covers. The general marks of a controlling group, and the difference between a demanding church and a coercive one, are set out in our guide to cults and how they differ from Christianity. That is a framework question and this page will not re-argue it. The specific question here is narrower: whether a movement founded on the private testimony of one man, whose central doctrines contradict the Creed and whose founding predictions did not happen, has given a reader any reason to accept its authority.

What this page does not claim

Several things about Branham are genuinely open, and stating them plainly is part of reporting him honestly.

• Whether any healing occurred. No independent medical audit of his campaigns was ever conducted. This page does not assert that a supernatural healing took place and does not assert that none did.
• Whether he was sincere. Nothing in the record establishes that Branham knowingly deceived anyone, and this page makes no such charge. A man can be sincere and mistaken, and the doctrinal problems stand either way.
• His standing before God. That is God's judgment and nobody else's. This page assesses teaching, which the Church tells believers to do, and passes no verdict on any soul.
• The Houston photograph. The examination of the negative is reported as it was reported. What produced the light on that film has never been determined by any competent authority, in either direction.
• The size of the movement today. Estimates differ too widely to state one responsibly, and this page has not adopted one.
• Individual Message congregations. They are independent and they differ. No claim made here about Branham's teaching should be read as a claim about the practices of any particular church.
• The details of the 1965 collision. Branham's injuries and his death on December 24, 1965, are documented. Who else was hurt in the two vehicles, and how badly, is not set out here.
• The current state of the movement. This page describes Branham, his teaching and the movement built on his sermons. It does not track the present activities, leadership or legal position of Voice of God Recordings or of any Message congregation, and nothing here should be read as a statement about where any of them stands now.

How to weigh a ministry like this

The tests a Catholic reader needs here are ordinary ones, and they were available to Branham's hearers in 1963 exactly as they are available now.

Check the doctrine against the Creed

The Creed is short, it is old, it is public, and it is memorable. A teaching that contradicts it is identifiable in one sentence by anyone who knows it. This is the single most useful piece of formation a believer can have against a persuasive teacher, and it costs nothing but the effort of learning it.

Ask what the authority rests on

An argument can be examined by anyone. A private encounter cannot. When a teacher's authority rests entirely on an experience nobody else witnessed, and when questioning it is treated as unbelief, the ordinary means of correction have been removed. Our guide to recognising wolves in sheep's clothing works through the warning signs.

Watch what happens to the Bible

Where a body of sermons functions as the key without which Scripture cannot be read, Scripture has been replaced in practice while being honoured in words. The test is simple: can a member of the congregation read a passage, reach a conclusion the teacher did not reach, and say so out loud without penalty?

Keep the ordinary means

Sacraments, a parish, confession, family and friends outside the group, and a priest who does not depend on you for anything. These are the ordinary structures by which a Christian stays correctable. They are unglamorous, and they are what a movement built on one man's voice cannot supply.

Prefer to support the work instead? Make a donation.

Frequently asked questions

Want the Trinity, the Creed and the church ages of Revelation taught properly, so the Message doctrines answer themselves? Get Pro for $49 once: in-depth Bible studies, audio devotionals on testing a teacher, guided prayers and offline access. Lifetime access, no subscription, 30-day money-back guarantee.