Christian Science Beliefs Explained

1. What Christian Science Is

Christian Science is a religious movement founded by Mary Baker Eddy in nineteenth century New England, organized as the Church of Christ, Scientist, and governed from The Mother Church in Boston. Its central claim is that God is infinite Mind and wholly good, that God alone is real, and that matter therefore has no reality of its own. Sin, sickness and death belong to what Eddy called mortal mind, a mistaken way of thinking that produces the appearance of disease and mortality without ever making them true.

Everything else in the movement follows from that claim. A Christian Science service reads the King James Bible alongside Eddy's Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures. A Christian Science practitioner treats illness by prayer that corrects thought rather than by any physical intervention. A Christian Science funeral speaks of a life that was never in the body to begin with. When members hesitate over hospital treatment, they hesitate because agreeing that a disease is real looks, on their premises, like the first step into it.

The movement is small and its own bylaws forbid counting it. The Manual of The Mother Church, in a bylaw headed "Numbering the People", prohibits members from publishing membership figures, so any specific total you see quoted is somebody's estimate rather than a church statistic. What is public is the directory in The Christian Science Journal, which lists branch churches and practitioners by name, and the listings have fallen a long way from their mid twentieth century peak.

The prohibition on publishing membership numbers is a bylaw in the Manual of The Mother Church by Mary Baker Eddy. The long-term decline in practitioner listings is documented by the sociologist Rodney Stark in "The Rise and Decline of Christian Science", Journal of Contemporary Religion (1998), which counted the names printed in the Journal directory across the twentieth century. No membership figure is given here because the Church itself publishes none.

2. Mary Baker Eddy and the Founding

Mary Baker Eddy (1821 to 1910) grew up in a Congregationalist household in New Hampshire, in a religious world shaped by Calvinist preaching about divine sovereignty, election and the terrors of judgment. She was ill through much of her early adulthood, widowed young, and by her thirties had worked through most of the therapies the age offered, including homeopathy and the water cure. Her recoil from the Calvinism of her childhood matters for reading her later work, because the God she went on to describe is one for whom evil, punishment and disease have no standing at all.

Phineas Quimby and the Mental Healing Milieu

In 1862 Eddy travelled to Portland, Maine, to be treated by Phineas Parkhurst Quimby, a clockmaker turned mental healer who taught that disease is produced by wrong belief and cured by correcting the patient's mind. She improved under his care and wrote warmly about him. Later, once Christian Science was established, she insisted that her system came from the Bible and from divine revelation rather than from Quimby, and critics have contested that ever since. Both things can be stated plainly: Eddy passed through the mental-healing world of her time, and the finished system she published goes considerably beyond anything Quimby taught, because Quimby had no doctrine that matter itself is unreal.

The Fall on the Ice, 1866

Christian Scientists date the discovery to February 1866. Eddy fell on ice in Lynn, Massachusetts, was seriously injured, and read the account of the healing of the paralytic in Matthew 9 while confined to bed. She rose healed, and understood the healing as the disclosure of a divine Science that had been in Scripture all along, waiting to be seen. She spent the next nine years working the insight into a book.

Science and Health, 1875

Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures appeared in 1875 and was revised by Eddy repeatedly until her death. She founded the Church of Christ, Scientist in Boston in 1879, opened the Massachusetts Metaphysical College to train practitioners, and reorganized the church in 1892 around The Mother Church, the First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston. In 1895 she issued the Manual of The Mother Church, the bylaws that still govern the movement. She launched The Christian Science Journal in 1883, in 1898 the weekly now called the Christian Science Sentinel, and in 1908, near the end of her life, The Christian Science Monitor, a daily newspaper that went on to win Pulitzer Prizes and to earn a reputation for international reporting well outside the movement that pays for it.

Eddy died on 3 December 1910 at Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts. The Manual she left behind fixed the structure so tightly that the church has never had a successor to her. There is no living leader, no ordained ministry, and no authority to revise Science and Health. A five-member Christian Science Board of Directors administers The Mother Church under the bylaws, and Eddy's book remains what it was in 1910.

3. The Six Tenets in Their Own Words

Christian Science has a short creed. Eddy printed six "Tenets of The Mother Church" in Science and Health at page 497, and they are read aloud in branch churches. They are worth reading slowly, because they sound close to ordinary Christian language until you notice what each one does with the word it borrows.

The first tenet takes the inspired Word of the Bible as a sufficient guide to eternal Life. The second acknowledges one supreme and infinite God, God's Son, the Holy Ghost or divine Comforter, and man in God's image and likeness. The third acknowledges God's forgiveness of sin in the destruction of sin and in the spiritual understanding that casts out evil as unreal, while adding that the belief in sin is punished so long as the belief lasts. The fourth acknowledges Jesus' atonement as the evidence of divine, efficacious Love, unfolding man's unity with God through Christ Jesus the Way-shower. The fifth acknowledges that the crucifixion of Jesus and his resurrection served to uplift faith to understand eternal Life, even the allness of Soul, Spirit, and the nothingness of matter. The sixth is a promise to watch and pray for that Mind to be in us which was also in Christ Jesus, to do to others as we would have them do to us, and to be merciful, just and pure.

Where the Familiar Words Turn

Read the third tenet again. Sin is forgiven by being understood as unreal, and the punishment attaches to the belief rather than to a deed done against God. Read the fourth. Jesus is the Way-shower, the one who demonstrated a truth the rest of us can also demonstrate, and the atonement is evidence of Love rather than a sacrifice offered for sin. Read the fifth, which states the system's whole physics in a phrase: the nothingness of matter.

A Catholic can affirm the wording of the sixth tenet without hesitation and can affirm very little of the third and fifth. That gap is the reason a Christian Science service can feel entirely familiar to a visitor for forty minutes and then land somewhere the Creed does not go.

4. The Claim That Matter Is Unreal

The core of Christian Science is a metaphysical claim about what exists. Eddy states it in a passage her churches call the scientific statement of being, printed in the chapter "Recapitulation" at page 468 of Science and Health and recited at the close of Sunday services.

Take that literally, because Christian Scientists do. Your body is not what you are. The material world you see is a mistaken rendering of a reality that is entirely Mind. Eddy names God with seven terms she uses as synonyms: Mind, Spirit, Soul, Principle, Life, Truth and Love. God is All, so anything unlike God has no real existence, and evil, sickness and death are all unlike God.

Mortal Mind and Error

Eddy calls the false way of thinking mortal mind, and calls its products error. Disease on this account is an error entertained in thought and expressed as a symptom. The tumour is a belief. The fever is a belief. Treating the belief is treating the disease, because there is nothing underneath the belief for medicine to reach. Eddy also wrote about malicious animal magnetism, harm done by the wrong mental action of others, a theme that occupied her considerably in later years and that features less in the movement today.

Why This Is a Coherent System

The position deserves to be stated at its strongest before it is answered. Christian Science begins from two premises most Christians hold: God is entirely good, and God is the source of all that is. It then draws a conclusion with rigour. If God is good and God made everything that exists, and if cancer is not good, then cancer was not made and does not exist in the only sense of existence that counts. Eddy is answering the problem of evil by denying the reality of the thing to be explained. The argument is clean, and its cost is the world.

The Catholic Answer: Creation Is Good and Real

Catholic teaching agrees that God is wholly good and denies the conclusion, because Scripture takes a different route through the same problem. Genesis has God look at what he has made and call it very good (Genesis 1:31), which requires that it be there to be looked at. Evil in Catholic thought is a privation, a wound in a real good, rather than an illusion in a mind. A tumour is a real disorder in a real body that God really made. That is worse in one way, because the suffering is genuine, and better in another, because a real wound can be really healed and a real body can really rise. Our guide to the Catholic doctrine of creation works through the goodness of created matter in more detail, and original sin explains where the disorder came from.

The apostle piles up the physical verbs on purpose. Heard, seen, looked at, touched with hands. John is writing against teachers who found the flesh embarrassing, and his answer is to insist on the fingertips. Christian Science reads that verse spiritually. The letter it opens will not permit it.

5. God, the Trinity, and Father-Mother God

Christian Science holds that God is one, infinite, and impersonal in the sense of not being a being among beings. Eddy's seven synonyms for God, Mind, Spirit, Soul, Principle, Life, Truth and Love, are the working vocabulary of the movement's prayer and preaching. She frequently addresses God as Father-Mother, and her spiritual interpretation of the Lord's Prayer in Science and Health opens by rendering "Our Father" as "Our Father-Mother God, all-harmonious".

How Eddy Treats the Trinity

Eddy explicitly rejects three divine Persons. She writes that the theory of three persons in one God suggests polytheism rather than the one ever-present I AM, and she reinterprets the Trinity as Life, Truth and Love, three names for one divine Principle. The Holy Ghost in her system is divine Science itself, the understanding that heals, rather than a Person who is worshipped and adored with the Father and the Son.

Christian Science is therefore a nontrinitarian movement, and it is nontrinitarian in a distinctive way. Jehovah's Witnesses hold that Jehovah alone is God and that the Son is his first creation, subordinate to him. Oneness Pentecostals hold that Father, Son and Holy Spirit are three manifestations of the one God, whose name is Jesus. Christian Science denies it by dissolving personhood in God altogether into Principle. Our guide to nontrinitarian churches maps those families against each other, and the doctrine of the Trinity sets out what the councils actually defined.

The Catholic Answer: Principle Cannot Love You

Catholic teaching confesses one God in three Persons, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, consubstantial and coeternal, defined at Nicaea in 325 and Constantinople in 381 and held in common with the Orthodox and with historic Protestantism. The pastoral weight of that doctrine is easy to state. A Principle can be understood. A Person can be addressed, and can answer. Christian prayer is a conversation inside the life of the Trinity, addressed to the Father, through the Son, in the Holy Spirit. Eddy's God is supremely good and has no face.

There is one point of genuine contact worth conceding. Eddy's Father-Mother language responds to something Scripture also contains: God is not male, and the prophets use maternal images for God, as in Isaiah 66:13 where God comforts as a mother comforts. The Catechism of the Catholic Church makes the same point, that God transcends the human distinction between the sexes and is neither man nor woman. Catholic teaching keeps the maternal images and keeps the Persons. Eddy keeps the images and loses the Persons.

6. Jesus and the Christ

Christian Science separates Jesus from the Christ, and the separation is the movement's decisive break with the Creed. Jesus is the human man of Nazareth, the Way-shower, who understood and demonstrated the spiritual facts of being more completely than anyone else in history. The Christ is the eternal divine idea of Sonship, the true idea of God, which Jesus expressed. On this account Jesus is the one who showed what the Christ is, rather than a divine Person who assumed a human nature.

What Follows From the Separation

Once Jesus and the Christ are two things, several conclusions arrive together. The Incarnation is no longer God becoming man, because there is no divine Person to become anything and no matter for him to become. The virgin birth becomes the demonstration of a spiritual origin rather than the conception of a real body in a real womb. The healings of the Gospels become demonstrations of a law any sufficiently enlightened person can also demonstrate, which is why Christian Science expects healings today and treats them as the ordinary evidence of its claims. And the uniqueness of Jesus becomes a matter of degree. He went further than anyone else along a road that is open to all.

The Catholic Answer: One Person, Two Natures

The Council of Chalcedon in 451 defined that Jesus Christ is one Person in two natures, truly God and truly man, the natures united without confusion, change, division or separation. Every word of that formula was written against a specific error, and the word "separation" was written against exactly this move. Christian Science divides the Christ from Jesus, which Chalcedon forbids, and empties the human nature of matter, which the councils treated as the collapse of the Gospel.

The New Testament makes the test explicit. In 1 John 4:2-3 the apostle gives a rule for discerning spirits: every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. The flesh is the hinge. The Incarnation is why matter can never be an embarrassment to Christians. God took it, wore it, died in it, and rose in it, and it is at the right hand of the Father now.

7. The Cross, the Atonement, the Resurrection

Christian Science reads the crucifixion as a demonstration rather than a sacrifice. Eddy writes in the chapter "Atonement and Eucharist" that the material blood of Jesus was no more efficacious to cleanse from sin when it was shed on the cross than when it was flowing in his veins as he went about his Father's business. The cleansing power is the Christ-idea, understood and lived. The physical blood does nothing that the life did not already do.

Atonement in Eddy's usage is at-one-ment, the recovery of the human unity with God that was never actually lost, since man in the image of God was always spiritual and always whole. Sin in her account is an error dispelled by understanding rather than a debt paid on a cross. This is why the third tenet says forgiveness happens in the destruction of sin and in the spiritual understanding that casts out evil as unreal.

The Resurrection as Proof That Death Was Never Real

Christian Science affirms the resurrection and means something specific by it. Jesus demonstrated that death has no power and no reality, and the three days in the tomb were a period during which he continued to think and to prove the nothingness of the grave. The empty tomb is evidence about the unreality of death rather than about the reviving of a corpse. There is no resurrection of the body at the end of time in Christian Science, because there is no body to raise. The final state is the disappearance of the material sense of things.

The Catholic Answer: A Real Death and a Real Body

Catholic teaching holds that Jesus really died, that his soul was separated from his body, that his body lay in the tomb and did not see corruption, and that on the third day he rose in that same body, glorified. He ate broiled fish in front of the apostles (Luke 24:42-43) and told Thomas to put his finger into the wounds (John 20:27), and the Gospels include those details because the earliest opponents were already saying that a spirit had appeared.

Paul's whole argument in 1 Corinthians 15 depends on the resurrection being an event in the world of matter, and he extends it to us: the dead will be raised imperishable, in bodies. The Creed says it in three words, the resurrection of the body, and Catholics say those words every Sunday. Our guide to the resurrection of the body sets out what the Church teaches about the risen body, and the Eucharist shows how far the Catholic position is from any embarrassment about matter, since the Church holds that Christ gives his own body and blood under the forms of bread and wine.

The contrast at the altar is the sharpest one in this whole comparison. Christian Science observes communion twice a year in silence, with no bread and no wine at all, understanding it as spiritual communion with God. The Catholic Church holds that the Word who took flesh gives that flesh to be eaten. Two churches, one word, opposite sacraments.

8. The Bible and Science and Health

Christian Science reads two books together, and the relationship between them is one of the clearest markers of the movement. The King James Bible is read at every service. Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures is read at every service alongside it, as the key that unlocks what the Bible means.

The Lesson-Sermon

There is no preacher in a Christian Science church. Each week the same Lesson-Sermon is read in every branch church worldwide, prepared centrally and published in the Christian Science Quarterly. It consists of a subject, a golden text, responsive reading, and then a series of passages alternating between the Bible and Science and Health. The Second Reader reads the Bible passages, and the First Reader reads the correlative passages from Eddy. The pairing is the interpretation, and no commentary is added. Members are expected to study the same Lesson through the week before it is read aloud on Sunday.

What the Pairing Does

Placing the two texts in alternation gives Eddy's book functional authority over the Bible without ever saying so. Scripture supplies the words, and Science and Health supplies what they mean, week after week, in a fixed sequence with no third voice. A verse about the healing of a leper, followed immediately by a paragraph on the unreality of disease, teaches a reading that no Christian Scientist has to be argued into.

Eddy's "Glossary" chapter completes the work by redefining biblical terms directly. Words such as Adam, Eve, Jerusalem, resurrection and death are given metaphysical meanings, and the Genesis narrative is treated as an allegory of the emergence of mortal mind. Catholic reading of Scripture also uses spiritual senses, and the difference is that the Catholic tradition insists that the spiritual senses rest on the literal sense and never abolish it. The Church reads the flood as a figure of baptism and still holds that something happened. Our guide to how Catholics read the Bible sets out the relationship between the literal and spiritual senses and the role of Tradition, and Sacred Tradition explains why the Church denies that any single later book can hold the key to Scripture.

9. How a Christian Science Church Works

A Christian Science branch church runs without clergy, without sacraments in the ordinary sense, and without sermons. The structure Eddy fixed in the Manual in 1895 has barely changed, and it makes the movement unusually uniform from one country to another.

Readers Instead of Ministers

Two Readers, elected from the congregation for fixed terms, conduct the service. The First Reader reads from Science and Health, the Second Reader reads from the Bible, and neither preaches. There is no ordination, no priesthood and no hierarchy of orders. The Mother Church in Boston holds the trademarks, publishes the literature and administers the bylaws through a Board of Directors, and each branch church is self-governing under those bylaws.

Wednesday Testimony Meetings

The Wednesday evening meeting is the most distinctive gathering in the movement. After readings, members stand and give testimonies of healing, describing conditions and how prayer resolved them. The meeting is open to visitors and is where an outsider will hear the movement's evidence in its own voice. Those testimonies are the movement's living argument, and they are also the reason careful conversation matters, because a Catholic who dismisses them as fabrication will be talking to nobody. People are describing what they believe happened to them.

Reading Rooms, the Journal, the Monitor

Christian Science Reading Rooms are public shops and libraries, usually on a high street, where anyone can read or buy the literature and sit quietly. The Christian Science Journal carries the official directory of churches, practitioners and nurses. The Christian Science Sentinel is the weekly. The Christian Science Monitor is a newspaper of general news, produced by the church and edited to cover the world rather than the movement, and it has long been read by people with no interest in Eddy's theology at all.

Sacraments and the Calendar

There is no water baptism in Christian Science. Baptism is understood as the purification of thought, a continuing spiritual process rather than a rite performed with water. Communion is observed twice a year, in silence and on the knees, with no elements. There are no priests, no confession, no anointing of the sick and no liturgical year in the Catholic sense. For what the Catholic Church holds those rites to be and to do, see our guides to baptism and confession.

10. Practitioners, Treatment, and Healing

A Christian Science practitioner is a member who devotes full time to healing others through prayer and who is listed by name in The Christian Science Journal. Practitioners take a two-week primary class from an authorised teacher, are accountable to the church for their listing, charge fees for treatment, and in the United States those fees have at times been accepted by insurers and by the Internal Revenue Service as medical expenses. They are not clergy and they hold no ordination.

What Treatment Consists Of

Treatment is prayer of a specific kind. The practitioner works to know the spiritual truth about the patient, that the patient as God's idea is whole, complete and never sick, and to deny the reality of the condition presented. There is no laying on of hands, no ritual, no anointing, and often no physical presence at all, since treatment is routinely given by telephone across long distances. The practitioner does not diagnose, does not prescribe, and does not describe the disease in medical terms, because naming a condition is understood to lend it substance in thought.

Christian Science Nursing

Christian Science nurses provide practical care, feeding, bathing, dressing wounds, moving patients, in homes and in Christian Science nursing facilities. They give no medication, take no clinical measurements and perform no medical procedures. The care is real physical care of a kind hospices would recognize, offered inside a framework that declines to treat the underlying condition medically.

What the Church Says About Doctors

The Church of Christ, Scientist states that the choice of care is a personal one and that no member is required to refuse medical treatment. The Manual allows a member with a broken or dislocated bone to have a surgeon set it while mental treatment continues, and members ordinarily use dentists, opticians and obstetric services. The church has also stated that its members comply with quarantine and reporting laws for contagious disease.

Set against that, practitioners will generally not continue treating a patient who is simultaneously under medical care, because the two approaches assume opposite things about whether the disease exists. The practical result for a member is a strong internal expectation of prayer rather than a written prohibition on medicine, and the distinction matters when you are trying to understand why a family made the choice it made. Nobody in that family was ordered to let anyone die.

11. Children, Medicine, and the Court Cases

The hardest question about Christian Science concerns children, who cannot consent to the framework their parents hold. An adult who declines treatment for himself is exercising a right that Catholic moral theology also recognizes within limits. A child treated by prayer alone for a bowel obstruction or for diabetes is in a different position entirely, and a series of American court cases in the 1980s and 1990s made that difference a matter of public record.

The Cases

In 1986 Robyn Twitchell, aged two, died in Boston of a bowel obstruction after his parents relied on Christian Science treatment. David and Ginger Twitchell were convicted of involuntary manslaughter, and in 1993 the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts set the convictions aside, holding that the trial should have allowed the parents to argue that they had relied on a published opinion of the state attorney general which appeared to protect spiritual treatment. The court did not hold that treatment by prayer alone was lawful in general.

In California, Laurie Walker relied on prayer for her four-year-old daughter Shauntay, who died of meningitis in 1984. In Walker v. Superior Court (1988) the Supreme Court of California held that the state's religious exemption in the misdemeanor neglect statute did not bar prosecution for manslaughter and felony child endangerment.

In Minnesota in 1989, eleven-year-old Ian Lundman died of untreated diabetes while under Christian Science treatment. In the civil case that followed, Lundman v. McKown, a jury awarded damages against the boy's mother, his stepfather, the practitioner and the Christian Science nurse, and the Minnesota Court of Appeals in 1995 upheld compensatory damages against those individuals while setting aside the punitive award.

Religious Exemptions in Law

The legal background is specific and often misreported. Regulations issued under the federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act in the mid 1970s pressed states to write religious exemptions into their child neglect statutes as a condition of federal funding, and that federal requirement was withdrawn in 1983. Many state exemptions enacted in response remained on the books afterwards, which is why the legal position still varies sharply from one American state to another. Christian Science has historically lobbied to keep those exemptions, and pediatric and child-protection bodies have long campaigned to repeal them.

What the Research Found

A study in the journal Pediatrics in 1998 by Seth Asser and Rita Swan examined 172 child deaths in the United States between 1975 and 1995 in families that relied on faith healing rather than medical care. The authors judged that 140 of those children would have had an expected survival rate above 90 percent with routine medical treatment, and Christian Science families accounted for 28 of the deaths in the sample.

Figures from Seth M. Asser and Rita Swan, "Child Fatalities From Religion-motivated Medical Neglect", Pediatrics, volume 101, number 4 (April 1998). The sample was assembled from cases the authors could identify and is not a complete national count, so it establishes a documented pattern rather than a rate. The case summaries above follow the published decisions in Commonwealth v. Twitchell (Massachusetts, 1993), Walker v. Superior Court (California, 1988) and Lundman v. McKown (Minnesota Court of Appeals, 1995).

The Catholic Position, Stated Plainly

Catholic moral teaching holds that parents owe their children ordinary care, and that ordinary medical treatment for a treatable condition is owed rather than optional. The Catechism of the Catholic Church at 2288 states that life and physical health are precious gifts entrusted to us by God and that we must take reasonable care of them. Refusing insulin to a diabetic child is a failure in justice to the child, whatever the parents sincerely believe about the nature of matter. The Church defends religious liberty firmly and does not extend it to the withholding of treatment from a person who cannot decide for himself.

One further point of fairness is owed. The great majority of Christian Scientists are ordinary people who love their children exactly as much as anyone else does, and the deaths that reached the courts are a small number of cases among many families. The criticism here is of a doctrine and its foreseeable consequences. It is not an accusation against the character of the people who hold it.

12. Is Christian Science Christian?

Christian Science presents itself as Christian, reads the Bible at every service, and its members understand themselves as followers of Jesus. By the standard the Catholic Church applies to that question, the answer is that Christian Science falls outside the Christian confession, and the reasons are specific rather than a matter of taste.

The Catholic Test

The Catholic Church has a working measure for who counts as a Christian, and it is not a judgment about sincerity. Christians are those validly baptised with water in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, who hold the faith the Creed states. On that measure the Catholic Church recognizes Protestant and Orthodox baptism, treats those baptised as truly if imperfectly in communion, and does not rebaptise converts from those bodies.

Christian Science practises no water baptism at all. There is nothing for the Church to examine, and a convert to Catholicism from Christian Science is baptised as an unbaptised person rather than received. That single fact settles the canonical question before any doctrinal argument begins. The doctrinal reasons run alongside it: Christian Science denies three divine Persons, denies that the Word became flesh, denies the reality of the body of Jesus and of his tomb, and denies the resurrection of the body at the end of time.

Where Christian Science Sits Relative to Other Movements

The comparison that helps most is with other nineteenth century American movements that use Christian vocabulary and that the Catholic Church treats as outside the Christian confession. The Catholic Church holds that Latter-day Saint baptism is invalid because of what the words mean in that system, and it holds that the teaching of Jehovah's Witnesses, that the Son is a creature and not God himself, contradicts what the Creed confesses. Christian Science reaches the same destination by a different road, through metaphysics rather than through a restorationist claim about a lost priesthood or a corrupted text.

A Word About the Term Cult

The word cult is doing several jobs at once and it is worth separating them. Sociologically it describes a new religious movement outside the mainstream. Theologically it describes a body whose doctrine departs from the Creed. Popularly it means coercion, isolation from family, and control. Christian Science fits the first two descriptions and fits the third poorly. Its members live ordinary lives, read a respected newspaper, come and go freely, and are not subject to shunning. Our guide to telling cults from Christianity works through the distinction and why a careless use of the word ends a conversation before it starts.

13. Catholic Teaching on the Body and Medicine

Catholic teaching holds that the body is good, that sickness is real, that God heals, and that medicine is one of the ordinary ways God heals. Those four statements together are the Catholic answer to Christian Science, and each of them has a text behind it.

The Body Is Good

God made the material world and called it very good (Genesis 1:31). The Catechism of the Catholic Church at 364 teaches that the human body shares in the dignity of the image of God, and that man is a unity of body and soul rather than a soul using a body. The Church condemned the ancient dualisms that treated flesh as a prison, and it condemned them for the same reason it answers Eddy: God made matter, God took matter, and God will raise matter.

Sickness Is Real and It Is Not a Verdict

When the disciples asked whose sin had caused a man's blindness, Jesus answered that neither the man nor his parents had sinned (John 9:3). The book of Job refuses at length the theory that suffering is the sufferer's fault. Christian Science does not accuse the sick of sin in that older way, and it does place the cause of the illness in the patient's own thought, which puts a similar weight on the patient. Catholic teaching lifts that weight off. You are ill because bodies break. Our guide to the Christian meaning of suffering works through what the Church does teach about pain, and it begins by clearing away what the Church denies.

God Heals, Through Doctors Among Other Means

Sirach 38 is the plainest text in Scripture on this question, and it is one of the deuterocanonical books that Catholic and Orthodox Bibles include, so a Christian Scientist reading the King James Version will usually not have met it. The chapter goes on to tell the sick person to pray, to give up faults, and to let the physician work, in that order and without any sense of competition between them. Our guide to the deuterocanonical books explains which books are involved and why the canons differ.

The Anointing of the Sick

The Church has a sacrament for illness. James 5:14-15 instructs the sick to call the elders of the church to pray over them and anoint them with oil in the name of the Lord, and the Catholic Church has done exactly that continuously since. The Catechism treats the anointing of the sick at paragraphs 1499 to 1532. The sacrament asks for physical healing where God wills it, gives grace and courage in the illness, forgives sins, and unites the sufferer to the Passion of Christ. It is administered in hospitals, in the presence of doctors, with the treatment continuing. There is no rivalry to manage.

Faith and Science Are Not in Conflict

Christian Science claims the word science and means something the sciences would not recognize, since its central claim cannot be tested and is not offered for testing. Catholic teaching takes the opposite view of the natural sciences, holding that the same God is the author of the created order and of revelation, so that honest inquiry into the world can never finally contradict the faith. Our guide to faith and science sets out that position and its history.

14. Talking With a Christian Scientist

Most readers arrive at this page because of a person rather than a doctrine. A relative has joined. A colleague has declined an operation. A neighbor has invited you to a Wednesday meeting. What follows is practical.

Start With Definitions

Ask what the words mean before you use them. When a Christian Scientist says God, Christ, atonement or healing, the meaning is supplied by Science and Health. Establishing that early prevents an hour of apparent agreement followed by sudden confusion, and it shows that you are listening rather than waiting.

Ask About the Tomb

The single most productive question is whether there was a body in the tomb. It goes to the Incarnation, the atonement and the resurrection at once, it cannot be answered without exposing the whole system, and it is a question about Jesus rather than an attack on Eddy. Follow it with 1 John 1:1 and let the verbs do the work.

Do Not Lead With the Medical Cases

Opening with dead children puts the other person on trial for something they did not do, and it will end the conversation. The doctrine comes first in the order of explanation, and it should come first in the order of discussion. The exception is a child at risk now, which calls for a doctor rather than a discussion.

Respect the Testimony

If someone tells you they were healed, you are hearing an account of their own life. Disputing it head-on achieves nothing and costs you the hearing. You can hold that God does heal, that the Church investigates claimed cures with medical rigour before it calls anything a miracle, and that a recovery does not by itself establish a metaphysics. All three are true at once.

Offer Something Better Than an Argument

The pull of Christian Science is real and it is worth naming: a God who is entirely good, a promise that evil has no final standing, a practice of prayer that expects something to happen, and a community that shows up. Catholic faith answers every one of those, and it answers them with a God who came into the wreckage rather than declaring it a mistake. Invite the person to a Mass. Show them the anointing of the sick. Read John 20 with them. That is a stronger offer than a list of errors.

Related Topics