Quaker Beliefs and Meetings Explained

1. Who Are the Quakers?

The Quakers are the Religious Society of Friends, a Christian movement that began in the north of England in the early 1650s around the preaching of George Fox. Friends teach that God places in every human being an inward light, a direct and personal address by the living Christ, and that a person who attends to that light is taught by Christ himself. Everything distinctive about Quakerism follows from that single claim, including silent worship, the absence of an ordained priesthood in the historic meetings, the refusal of oaths, and the setting aside of water baptism and the Lord's Supper.

The name "Quaker" began as an insult. Fox records that Justice Gervase Bennet at Derby in 1650 called him and his followers Quakers because Fox had told the court to tremble at the word of the Lord. Friends adopted the nickname and it stuck. Their own name for themselves comes from the words of Jesus at the Last Supper, "I have called you friends" (John 15:15), and their formal title, the Religious Society of Friends, is the one used in their books of discipline.

Two things surprise people who meet Quakerism through the popular image of a silent meeting house in New England. The first is that most Quakers in the world today worship with a pastor, hymns and a prepared sermon, in what Friends call programmed worship. The second is that the largest concentration of Friends is in Kenya. Quakerism is a global evangelical movement as well as a quiet Anglo-American one, and a description that covers only the silent meeting describes a minority of the Society.

Membership figures for Friends worldwide are gathered and published by the Friends World Committee for Consultation (FWCC), which collects self-reported totals from yearly meetings; FWCC's published totals have been in the region of 350,000 to 400,000, and they are not independently audited. FWCC's own survey reporting describes Kenya as holding the largest national body of Friends and programmed worship as the majority practice worldwide.

2. George Fox and the First Friends

George Fox (1624 to 1691) was a Leicestershire weaver's son, apprenticed to a shoemaker, who left home at nineteen in spiritual distress and spent four years walking between towns asking ministers for help. He found none of their answers satisfying. In 1647 he came to the conviction that settled his life, recorded in his Journal: he heard a voice saying that there is one, even Christ Jesus, who can speak to his condition. The point Fox drew from it was that Christ teaches his people himself, without waiting on a university-trained minister or a printed liturgy.

Fox preached that message across the north of England through the early 1650s. The turning point came in 1652, when he climbed Pendle Hill in Lancashire and, he wrote, was shown a great people to be gathered. In Westmorland he found them: communities of Seekers who had already left the parish churches and were waiting for a true church to appear. Whole congregations joined him. From that base came the travelling preachers later known as the Valiant Sixty, and a household that became the movement's centre, Swarthmoor Hall, home of Margaret Fell (1614 to 1702), who organised the funds, the correspondence and the legal defence of the young Society and who married Fox in 1669.

Persecution and Its Cost

The first Friends were prosecuted heavily. Under the Quaker Act of 1662 and the Conventicle Acts, Friends were fined and imprisoned for meeting, for refusing the oath of allegiance, and for refusing to pay tithes to the parish church. Their goods were seized by distraint. Fox himself was imprisoned repeatedly, including long stretches at Derby, Launceston, Lancaster and Worcester. Friends did not meet in secret to escape it. They met openly, on the ground of their meeting houses when the buildings were locked, and when the adults were taken the children continued the meeting. Relief came slowly, with the Toleration Act of 1689 and the Affirmation Act of 1696, which let Quakers give a solemn affirmation in place of an oath.

One episode from the movement's first decade still shapes how Friends govern themselves. In 1656 James Nayler, a leading Quaker preacher, rode into Bristol while followers strewed garments and cried hosanna, in a re-enactment of Christ's entry into Jerusalem. Parliament convicted him of blasphemy and punished him savagely. Friends drew from the crisis the lesson that individual leadings need the testing of the gathered community, and the structures of Quaker church government were built partly to supply that test.

William Penn and the Holy Experiment

William Penn (1644 to 1718), the son of an admiral, joined Friends as a young man and received from Charles II in 1681 a charter for the American colony that became Pennsylvania. Penn intended it as a holy experiment: religious liberty in law, a treaty relationship with the Lenape rather than conquest, and government without an established church. Quakers dominated the Pennsylvania Assembly for decades, and the conflict between the peace testimony and the duties of a colonial government eventually drove many Friends out of office during the frontier wars of the 1750s. Penn's colony gave American Quakerism a scale and a public confidence that shaped its later work against slavery.

3. The Inward Light

The inward light, also called the inner light, the light of Christ or that of God in everyone, is the central Quaker doctrine: Christ himself is present to every person, teaching, convicting of sin and giving power to obey. Friends ground it in the prologue of John's Gospel, which describes the Word as the true light that enlightens every man coming into the world (John 1:9). For Fox, that verse means Christ has already come to every soul, and the work of the preacher is to turn people to the teacher already within them.

Friends are careful about what the light is. Robert Barclay (1648 to 1690), the Scottish theologian whose Apology for the True Christian Divinity (1676) remains the classic systematic statement of Quaker belief, insisted that the light is not natural human reason or conscience. Barclay called it a supernatural principle, a seed of God placed in fallen humanity by grace, which can be resisted and quenched. He held that saving knowledge comes through immediate revelation by the Spirit, and that such revelation never contradicts Scripture or sound reason, since the same Spirit gave both.

Scripture and the Light

Friends hold Scripture in high honour while assigning it a place they describe carefully. Barclay's formula is that the Scriptures are a declaration of the fountain rather than the fountain itself: they are the faithful record of what the Spirit gave to prophets and apostles, and the Spirit who gave them is the one who opens them. Early Friends knew the Bible closely, and Fox's writing is dense with scriptural phrase. The practical effect of the formula is that a Friend appeals finally to the Spirit's present witness, with Scripture as the trusted test of whether a leading is genuine.

Catholic teaching agrees with more of this than a reader might expect. The Church holds that the Holy Spirit is genuinely at work in the interior life of every believer, that grace precedes and enables every good act, and that Scripture is read rightly only in the Spirit in whom it was written. Where the paths part is over whether Christ also gave his Church a public and structured means of grace, in a visible body with apostolic authority and sacraments, alongside his interior work. Catholics say he did. The site's guide to the Holy Spirit sets out the Catholic account of that interior work.

What the Light Costs

The doctrine carried a heavy practical demand. If Christ teaches directly, then no one can outsource obedience to a minister or a rite. Early Friends were known for a scrupulous seriousness about small acts, since every dealing was under the eye of the teacher within. That produced the Quaker reputation for honest trade, and it produced a rigorous discipline in which meetings visited members over debts, drunkenness or marrying outside the Society, and disowned those who would not be turned.

4. Unprogrammed Worship: The Silent Meeting

Unprogrammed Quaker worship has no minister, no order of service, no hymns, no readings and no sermon prepared in advance. Friends enter a plain room, sit on benches usually arranged facing inward on all four sides so that no one is at the front, and settle into silence. They are waiting on God. The expectation is that Christ will teach the gathered meeting, and that some of what he gives will be spoken aloud.

A meeting for worship typically runs about an hour. Anyone present, member or visitor, may rise and speak if they believe a message has been given for the meeting. Friends call this vocal ministry. It is expected to be brief, offered once, and followed by silence long enough for the words to settle; Friends discourage speaking twice in one meeting, and they discourage responding to another's message as though in debate. Some meetings are entirely silent from beginning to end, and Friends do not count that a failure. The meeting closes when the Friend appointed for the purpose shakes hands with a neighbour, and the whole room follows.

The Gathered Meeting

Friends use the phrase "a gathered meeting" or "a covered meeting" for the experience in which the silence deepens and those present sense a single presence holding them together. Quaker writers describe it as the point of the practice: worship that is corporate even when nothing is said, because the same Lord is addressing everyone in the room at once. Thomas Kelly's A Testament of Devotion (1941) is the best-known modern description of that state from inside the tradition.

Catholics have a genuine analogue for this and generally underuse it. Contemplative prayer in the Catholic tradition is exactly the practice of waiting on God in silence, and the Catechism describes contemplative prayer as a gaze of faith fixed on Jesus, a hearing of the word of God, and a silent love (CCC 2715 to 2717). Eucharistic adoration puts that silence in front of the Blessed Sacrament. A Catholic who has spent an hour in adoration knows most of what a Friend means by waiting worship, with the addition of the One before whom the waiting is done.

5. Programmed Worship and Pastoral Friends

Programmed Quaker worship looks, to a visitor, much like a service in an evangelical Protestant church: hymns, Scripture reading, prayer, a sermon by a paid pastor, and usually a period of open or waiting worship preserved inside the order of service. This is the practice of most Friends in the world, including the large Friends churches in Kenya, Bolivia, Guatemala and Burundi, and much of Quakerism in the American Midwest and West.

The change came out of the nineteenth-century American revivals. As Friends were swept into the holiness movement after the 1860s, meetings began holding revival services, singing, and appointing pastors to care for the many new members who had no background in Quaker practice. Recorded ministers, whom Friends had long acknowledged as gifted in vocal ministry without paying or ordaining them, became in some yearly meetings salaried pastors with an office. Missionary work carried this pastoral pattern into East Africa and Latin America from the late nineteenth century, which is why the Society's largest bodies today are programmed.

What Stayed the Same

Pastoral Friends generally kept the older Quaker distinctives even while adopting a service. Most evangelical and pastoral yearly meetings continue to hold that baptism and the Lord's Supper are inward and do not celebrate the outward rites, retain the peace testimony in their books of discipline, keep the Quaker method of decision by discernment rather than majority vote, and hold to plain integrity in speech and business. A Friends church in Kenya on a Sunday morning sings and hears preaching, and it still has no font and no communion table.

The description of programmed worship as the majority practice among Friends worldwide, and the concentration of Friends in East Africa and the Andes, follow the Friends World Committee for Consultation's own reporting on its member yearly meetings, together with the published constitutions and books of discipline of Friends United Meeting and Evangelical Friends Church International.

Silent and programmed Friends sometimes struggle to recognise each other. A liberal unprogrammed Friend in London and an evangelical pastor in Kakamega may share a name and a formal history and very little vocabulary. The Friends World Committee for Consultation exists in large part to hold those parts of the Society in conversation.

6. How Friends Decide: The Sense of the Meeting

Quakers make decisions without voting. A meeting for worship for business begins in the same waiting silence as worship, the clerk lays an item before the meeting, and Friends speak to it one at a time, addressing the clerk rather than each other. The clerk listens for what Friends call the sense of the meeting, drafts a minute stating it, reads the minute aloud, and revises it until the meeting can unite behind it. Nothing is carried by a majority, and a single Friend who cannot unite with a proposal can ask that it be held over.

The vocabulary that surrounds this is worth learning, because it appears throughout Quaker writing:

• Leading. A sense of being drawn by God toward a particular action.
• Concern. A leading that has been tested by the meeting and taken up as a shared responsibility, often for a lifetime of work.
• Clearness committee. A small group appointed to help a Friend test a leading, a proposed marriage, or an application for membership, by asking questions rather than giving advice.
• Way opening. The sense that circumstances are confirming a leading. Friends will speak of proceeding "as way opens".
• Standing aside. A Friend who disagrees but does not wish to block the meeting allows the minute to proceed with that reservation recorded.
• Advices and queries. Short questions for self-examination printed in each yearly meeting's book of discipline and read aloud in meetings, for example on the use of money, on truthfulness, and on the care of the meeting for its members.

Catholics who have sat through a badly run parish council meeting will feel the appeal of this. The method assumes that a decision is a matter of discernment rather than of preference, and it makes obstruction costly, since a Friend who blocks must be willing to say before the meeting that God is not in the proposal. Catholic practice has its own version of the same instinct in the discernment of spirits described by St Ignatius of Loyola, and in the synodal method of conversation in the Spirit now used in diocesan and universal synods.

7. The Testimonies: Peace, Integrity, Equality, Simplicity, Community

The Quaker testimonies are practical commitments rather than a creed, the things Friends understand to follow when a person actually obeys the inward light, and they are usually listed today as peace, integrity, equality, simplicity and community, with stewardship of creation added by many meetings. Friends speak of testifying rather than believing, because the point of a testimony is a life that demonstrates the claim.

Peace

The peace testimony is the best known and the most costly. Its classic statement is the declaration presented to Charles II in January 1661, dated 1660 in the old style calendar then in use, after Friends had been accused of plotting, in which Fox and others declared that the spirit of Christ would never move them to fight any outward war for any kingdom or for the kingdoms of this world. Friends have refused military service in every subsequent generation, at the price of imprisonment, seized property and, in the twentieth century, hard labour.

The Catholic tradition takes the same commands of Christ and reaches a different conclusion about the duties of public authority. The Church teaches that legitimate defence can be a grave duty for those responsible for the lives of others, and it sets strict conditions under which force may be used (CCC 2309), while insisting that everything else be tried first. Catholic teaching also honours the Quaker conscience directly: the Catechism asks public authorities to make equitable provision for those who refuse to bear arms for reasons of conscience (CCC 2311). The full Catholic case, with its criteria and its limits, is set out in the guide to just war teaching.

Integrity

Integrity for Friends means that speech is uniform: the same truth is told to everyone, under no special ceremony. It produced the refusal of oaths treated in the next section, and it produced the fixed price. Early Quaker shopkeepers refused to haggle, marking one honest price for every customer, on the ground that charging a stranger more than a neighbour is a lie told with numbers. That practice, more than any argument, built the Quaker commercial reputation that later carried firms like Barclays and Lloyds banking, and the Cadbury, Rowntree and Fry chocolate houses.

Equality

Friends held from the beginning that the light is given to every person, which levelled distinctions that seventeenth-century England took for granted. Quakers refused to remove their hats to social superiors, addressed everyone with the familiar "thee" and "thou" rather than the deferential "you", and refused honorific titles. Women preached from the first years, and Margaret Fell published Women's Speaking Justified in 1666 to defend the practice from Scripture. Friends established separate women's business meetings with real authority over the Society's charitable and disciplinary work at a time when almost no other body did.

The Catholic Church holds the same foundation, that every human being is made in the image of God (Genesis 1:27) and that in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female (Galatians 3:28). The Church draws a distinction Friends do not, between that equal dignity and the ordained priesthood, which it holds to be a service conferred by Christ on those he calls rather than a status earned or a rank. The reasoning is set out in the guide to the Catholic priesthood.

Simplicity

Simplicity meant plain dress in undyed or sober cloth, plain furniture, plain meeting houses with clear glass and no ornament, plain gravestones of a uniform size, and a life stripped of what Friends called superfluity. The scriptural root is Christ's command to store treasure in heaven rather than on earth (Matthew 6:19-21). Most Friends abandoned distinctive plain dress during the nineteenth century, and conservative meetings retained it longest. The commitment survives today as a testimony against consumption and against the crowding of a life with things that do not serve.

Community

Community expresses itself in the mutual care meetings take for their members: help in sickness and poverty, the education of children in Friends schools, the testing of decisions in clearness committees, and the burying of members in the meeting's own ground. Quaker marriage carries the same mark. Friends marry without an officiant: the couple stand in meeting for worship, make their promises to each other before God and the gathered Friends, and everyone present signs the certificate as witness. English law has recognised Quaker marriages since Lord Hardwicke's Marriage Act of 1753, which exempted Friends and Jews from its requirement of a Church of England ceremony.

8. Oaths, Hat Honour and the Plain Life

Friends refuse to swear oaths, taking Christ's command in the Sermon on the Mount as a plain prohibition. The refusal was the single practice that put more Quakers in prison than any other, because the courts of Stuart England used the oath of allegiance as a test: a magistrate who wanted a Quaker convicted needed only to require the oath, and the refusal supplied the offence.

The Quaker argument goes further than the text. If a person swears to tell the truth on this occasion, the implication is that ordinary speech carries a lower standard. Friends held that a Christian's word is under the same obligation always, so an oath sets up two grades of truthfulness and thereby licenses the lower one. James repeats the command in the same terms (James 5:12). The Affirmation Act of 1696 gave Friends a legal alternative in England, and affirmation is now available in the courts of most common law countries because Quakers spent decades in gaol establishing it.

The Catholic Position on Oaths

The Catholic Church holds that an oath is lawful when a legitimate authority requires it for a grave and just reason, for example in court (CCC 2154). The Catechism also treats the swearing of God's name over trivial matters as an offence against that name, so the Catholic permission is narrow. The reading of Matthew 5 behind that position is that Christ is attacking the rabbinic system of graded oath formulas, some binding and some not, which had made swearing a tool of evasion. St Paul, who knew the Lord's teaching, calls God as witness to his own truthfulness more than once (Romans 1:9, 2 Corinthians 1:23, Galatians 1:20), which suggests the apostolic Church did not read the command as an absolute ban on solemn invocation.

The Church nonetheless holds the substance of the Quaker point. Christian speech should be so truthful that an oath adds nothing. Friends built a legal reform out of taking that seriously, and Catholic countries did not.

Plain Speech and the Calendar

Two further Quaker practices puzzle newcomers. Friends historically refused the names of the days and months, since Sunday, Monday, Thursday, January and March carry the names of pagan deities. They wrote First Day for Sunday and Third Month for March. Friends also refused to keep Christmas, Easter and the fasts of the church year, holding that all days are alike holy and that setting some apart implies the rest are common. Plain Quaker practice made every day a day for God and no day a feast.

The Catholic answer is that time itself has been redeemed and can be consecrated. The liturgical year walks the Church through the mysteries of Christ's life once every year, so that a whole lifetime is shaped by them. The Church took over the calendar it inherited and filled it with Christ, which is the same instinct that puts a cathedral on a hilltop where a shrine once stood. The guide to the liturgical calendar sets out how the year is built.

9. Why Friends Set Aside Baptism and Communion

Friends do not baptize with water and do not celebrate the Lord's Supper, and the reason is theological rather than casual. Quakers hold that Christ gives the realities those rites signify directly and inwardly, so that the outward ceremony has served its purpose and passed away. Friends state this positively: every meal is a communion, every moment of obedience is a baptism into Christ's death, and the whole of life is sacramental precisely because no part of it is fenced off as more holy than the rest.

The classic argument is Barclay's, in propositions twelve and thirteen of the Apology. Set out in his own order, it runs like this.

The Quaker Case, Stated Fairly

• One baptism. Paul says there is one Lord, one faith, one baptism (Ephesians 4:5). John the Baptist distinguished his water baptism from the baptism Christ would give, in the Holy Spirit and fire (Matthew 3:11). If there is only one baptism and Christ's is the baptism of the Spirit, then the water baptism of John belonged to a preparatory dispensation that has ended.
• Baptized by one Spirit. Paul describes entry into the body of Christ as the work of the Spirit: by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body (1 Corinthians 12:13). Friends read that as the definition of Christian baptism.
• The supper is a knocking at the door. The communion Christ offers his Church now is the one he describes in Revelation 3:20, where he stands at the door and knocks, and promises to come in and eat with anyone who opens. That eating is inward and continuous.
• The flesh profits nothing. After the bread of life discourse, Jesus tells the disciples that the Spirit gives life and the flesh is of no avail, and that the words he has spoken are spirit and life (John 6:63). Friends take this as Christ's own instruction that the eating he means is spiritual.
• Outward forms breed formalism. Barclay's pastoral argument is that Christendom had reduced religion to attendance at ceremonies performed by professionals, and that people were being assured of salvation on the strength of a rite while their lives were unchanged. Removing the rite removes the hiding place.
• The apostolic practices were concessions. Friends acknowledge that the New Testament records water baptisms and the breaking of bread. They read those as accommodations to Jewish and Gentile converts during a transitional period, on the pattern of circumcision and the Jerusalem temple, which the apostles also tolerated for a time.

Two points of fairness are owed to Friends here. First, they affirm that God gives grace, and they deny only that grace requires a physical instrument. Second, they take the New Testament seriously and read particular texts in a way that has to be answered from those texts. A Catholic who dismisses the Quaker position as a rejection of the Bible has not read Barclay.

Practice varies at the edges. Some evangelical Friends congregations, particularly where Friends grew up alongside other evangelical churches, offer water baptism or the Lord's Supper or leave the question to individual conscience. Across the Society as a whole, including its programmed and evangelical majority, the historic position holds and the outward rites are not celebrated.

Friends are not alone in this. The Salvation Army reached a similar practice by a different route, keeping the rites for its first eighteen years and then setting them aside in 1883 for largely pastoral reasons, while keeping preaching, a written creed, a commissioned ministry and a strong ceremonial of its own. Readers comparing the two bodies should see the guide to the Salvation Army and the sacraments.

10. The Catholic Answer: The Incarnation and Why God Uses Matter

The Catholic answer to the Quaker case is that God has decided to reach human beings through matter, and he decided it definitively when the Word became flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14). Christianity is the religion in which God took a body, was carried in a womb, ate fish after his resurrection and let a doubting apostle put a hand in his side. A God who does that is not likely to consider water, bread and oil beneath him. The sacraments continue the logic of the Incarnation into the life of the Church.

The Text That Answers Barclay

The sharpest reply to the Quaker reading of baptism is Acts 10. Peter is preaching in the house of Cornelius when the Holy Spirit falls on everyone listening, and the Jewish believers present are astonished to see Gentiles speaking in tongues and praising God. On the Friends' reading, the work is now complete: the baptism of the Spirit has been given, so nothing outward remains to be done. Peter's actual response is the opposite.

Peter has just watched the inward baptism happen in front of him, and he orders the water anyway. He does not treat the outward rite as a superseded shadow. He treats it as the thing Christ commanded, which the visible gift of the Spirit now makes it impossible to refuse. The same order appears in the Great Commission, where the risen Christ tells the eleven to make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 28:19), and in Peter's answer at Pentecost, repent and be baptized every one of you (Acts 2:38).

On the One Baptism

Catholic teaching agrees with Ephesians 4:5 that there is one baptism, and identifies it as the single rite in which the Spirit acts through the water. The Catholic position proposes one baptism with two aspects, a visible sign and an invisible grace, joined by Christ's institution, with no second baptism competing against it. Jesus states both halves in a single sentence to Nicodemus: unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God (John 3:5). The water and the Spirit stand together in the text.

On John 6:63

The Friends' appeal to "the flesh is of no avail" has to be read against the discourse it closes. In John 6 Jesus tells the crowd that the bread he will give is his flesh for the life of the world, and when they object he sharpens the claim instead of softening it, saying that whoever eats his flesh and drinks his blood has eternal life (John 6:51-56). Many disciples leave over it, and he lets them go. The Catholic reading of verse 63 is that "the flesh" there means the merely human way of judging, the same usage Paul has when he contrasts flesh and Spirit, since Jesus has spent the whole discourse insisting on his flesh as the food he gives. The full treatment is in the guide to the Eucharist.

What the Church Concedes to Friends

Barclay's pastoral warning lands, and Catholic teaching says so. The Catechism holds that the sacraments confer the grace they signify by the power of Christ's own action, and immediately adds that the fruits of the sacraments depend on the dispositions of the one who receives them (CCC 1128). A sacrament received without faith or repentance does not sanctify a person against their will. Every Catholic priest has seen the formalism Fox attacked, and the Church's own answer to it is to demand conversion of the one who approaches the rite, which is why confession stands between grave sin and communion.

The Church also teaches that God is not bound by his sacraments even though he has bound us to them. A person who seeks the truth and does God's will as he knows it, and who has not received baptism through no fault of his own, is entrusted to God's mercy (CCC 1257 and 1260). Catholics have no grounds for declaring Quakers outside God's grace. What Catholics do say is that Christ left the Church means of grace that he intended to be used, and that setting them aside is a real loss.

Where Friends and Catholics Genuinely Meet

The Second Vatican Council teaches that Christian communities separated from Rome are used by the Spirit of Christ as means of salvation, and that elements of sanctification exist and operate outside the visible bounds of the Catholic Church (Unitatis Redintegratio 3). Applied to Friends, that means the Quaker witness to silence, honesty and peace is a real work of the Spirit that Catholics should recognise and learn from. The guide to Catholic ecumenism explains the framework.

11. The Four Branches of Quakerism Today

Quakerism divided in the nineteenth century and has four recognisable branches today: liberal, evangelical, pastoral and conservative. The splits began with the Hicksite separation of 1827 and 1828 in America, when Friends divided over the authority of Scripture, the person of Christ and the power of elders, and continued through the Gurneyite and Wilburite divisions of the 1840s and 1850s over revivalism and evangelical doctrine. The branches differ mainly on two axes: whether worship is programmed, and how tightly belief is defined.

Branch descriptions are summarised from the published books of discipline, constitutions and doctrinal statements of Friends General Conference, Evangelical Friends Church International, Friends United Meeting, Britain Yearly Meeting and the Conservative yearly meetings named. Founding dates are those the bodies give for themselves.

The Question of Christian Identity

The most contested question inside modern Quakerism is whether a Friend must be a Christian. In evangelical, pastoral and conservative meetings the answer is a clear yes, stated in the body's own documents. In liberal meetings, particularly Britain Yearly Meeting and much of Friends General Conference, membership rests on a commitment to the Quaker way rather than on a doctrinal confession, and those meetings include Friends who describe themselves as universalist or nontheist. Britain Yearly Meeting's book of discipline, Quaker Faith and Practice, is an anthology of Friends' writing rather than a creed, and the yearly meeting revises it periodically.

Stating this plainly is a courtesy to both sides. A reader who meets Quakerism through a liberal meeting in a university town and a reader who meets it through a Friends church in western Kenya are meeting bodies whose stated beliefs differ substantially, and the shared name conceals that.

12. Slavery, Prison Reform and Conscientious Objection

The Quaker record in public life is the strongest argument Friends have ever made, and Catholics should say so. A very small body of people, a minority everywhere it settled, put itself early and at cost on the right side of three questions that the larger churches were slow to face.

Slavery

The earliest known written protest against slavery in the American colonies came from Friends. In 1688, four Quakers of Dutch and German background at Germantown in Pennsylvania signed a petition asking their monthly meeting how Christians could hold men and women as property when the golden rule requires doing to others as one would be done by. The meeting passed it upward without acting on it, and the paper was lost from view until 1844, so it changed nothing at the time and it remains the first document of its kind.

The sustained campaign came from John Woolman (1720 to 1772), a New Jersey tailor who travelled among Friends for thirty years pressing slaveholding Quakers, one household at a time, to free the people they held. Woolman refused to be served by enslaved people and left payment for their labour when he could not avoid it, and his Journal and his essay Some Considerations on the Keeping of Negroes (1754) carried the argument through the Society. Anthony Benezet took the same case to a wider public. Philadelphia Yearly Meeting acted against members who traded in slaves in 1758 and by 1776 required members to free those they held, ahead of the first American state abolition laws in Vermont and Pennsylvania and nearly ninety years before the Thirteenth Amendment.

In Britain, Friends supplied the organising core of abolition. When the Society for Effecting the Abolition of the Slave Trade was founded in London in 1787, nine of its twelve founding members were Quakers, who brought to it the meeting networks, the printing capacity and the petitioning experience the campaign needed. Because Friends could not sit in Parliament while the oath was required, they worked through Anglican allies, Granville Sharp and William Wilberforce among them.

The composition of the 1787 abolition committee is recorded in the society's own founding minute book, held with the abolition papers in the British Library. The Germantown petition of 1688 survives in the records of Philadelphia Yearly Meeting and is held at Haverford College. Philadelphia Yearly Meeting's disciplinary actions of 1758 and 1776 are recorded in its own minutes.

Prison Reform

Elizabeth Fry (1780 to 1845), a Quaker minister from Norwich, visited the women's side of Newgate Prison in London in 1813 and found women and children crowded together without bedding, work or schooling. She organised the Association for the Improvement of the Female Prisoners in Newgate in 1817, bringing in matrons, schooling for the children held with their mothers, paid work, and the reading of Scripture. Her evidence to a House of Commons committee in 1818 made her the most influential voice in British penal reform of her generation.

Honesty requires a second entry in the same ledger. Friends in Pennsylvania promoted the penitentiary as a humane alternative to the gallows and the whipping post, and the system built on that idea at Eastern State Penitentiary from 1829 relied on prolonged solitary confinement so that a prisoner would be driven to penitence. The intention was mercy. The result, as Charles Dickens reported after visiting in 1842, was a form of suffering he considered worse than physical punishment. Reformers get things wrong, and the Quaker case is stronger for admitting it.

Conscientious Objection

Friends carried the peace testimony into the twentieth century's wars and paid for it. In the First World War, Quakers were among the most active members and funders of the No-Conscription Fellowship in Britain, and hundreds of conscientious objectors, Quakers among them, were imprisoned; some were shipped to France and sentenced to death before the sentences were commuted. Other Friends served the wounded without weapons through the Friends Ambulance Unit, founded in 1914 and revived in the Second World War. The American Friends Service Committee was founded in 1917 to give American objectors constructive service, and it went on to run relief feeding in Germany, Austria and Russia after the armistice.

In 1947 the Norwegian Nobel Committee awarded the Nobel Peace Prize jointly to the American Friends Service Committee and the Friends Service Council in Britain, on behalf of the Society as a whole, citing the silent help Friends had given to many nations. The relief work had been done for the populations of countries Britain and America had recently been at war with.

Related Topics